On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:21:40 +0530 wrote >On Saturday 26 June 2010 09:55:38 prakash srinivasan wrote:
>> >Will they reply? >> Definitely NO. >definitely YES Fine. Keep the same momentum for "while()". >>Do not expect the reply here from any one of NRCFOSS employees >>include >>Mr.Kenneth. There are many other present/ex NRCFOSS people >>are watching >>this list. But they cant take any responsibilities. >>They are here just >>because of their interest in FOSS/GNU Linux. > >project engineers are not allowed to speak on behalf of NRC-FOSS - >but senior >staff will certainly both take responsibilities and speak. > >In this case, this part of the syllabus was not an NRC-FOSS >initiative. It >has been drafted by the BOS of Anna University who had >taken some feedback >from some of us. As such NRC-FOSS had made no >commitments regarding the >portal. The delay in replying to this is >due to the fact that NRC-FOSS is a >large project run by 7 different >institutions and we had to check with all of >them and our exstaff >members to ascertain whether we had any role in this >matter. That >said, we are now discussing with AU as to whether we can play a >role >to support this initiative, and also we are quite willing to host any >>support materials that luggies can provide. Appreciate the effort. Let us hope, the effort will come to the right target soon. If it is possible, you may provide more info here about who are the other institutions, AUKBC-NRCFOSS role, Other's role, current structure of NRCFOSS,.etc. So that they can understand the complete structure/processes and avoid the controversies in future anything relevant to NRCFOSS. Hope your infos may stop the controversy between LUGGIES and NRCFOSS. -prakash _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
