On 2/1/07, Vikas Rawal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:16:34PM +0530, Vishnu Gopal wrote: > > I'm not sure what's wrong, is the money somehow tainted? In the all > > the events I've organized the sponsors don't have much of a say on > > *how* the event is organized, or what is actually said/done at the > > event. Just that they want this much space for the stalls, this much > > of time on stage, this much of projector space, their name in the > > branding etc... not sure it's that much of a problem. > > they take time on stage, they take projector space, they put up stalls > in physical space, and they have their name in the branding.. > > what else would you think compromises the agenda? > > poor rajinder da dhaba is not going to ask for most of these. >
Why would it compromise the goals/agenda? An event is different from the sponsorship. It's like the Google sponsored ads that I see towards the right of Gmail. They take up space, they advertise themselves, they ask for some of my time, but they are different from the emails I type in here. Anyways, feel free to take this off-list/IRC, don't want this to degrade to a Is Microsoft good/evil conversation. And sorry for the top post. Later, Vish > vikas > > > _______________________________________________ > ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi > http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/ > _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
