I'm not sure what's wrong, is the money somehow tainted? In the all the events I've organized the sponsors don't have much of a say on *how* the event is organized, or what is actually said/done at the event. Just that they want this much space for the stalls, this much of time on stage, this much of projector space, their name in the branding etc... not sure it's that much of a problem.
Is your opposition on ideological grounds? Then it's definitely a no-no. Vish On 2/1/07, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 01-Feb-07, at 12:40 PM, Raj Shekhar wrote: > > >> having a stall put up. Heck they even have a stall at ze LinuxWorld. > >> (Ironic that the LinuxWorld site runs .asp methinks) > > > > I think LCA is the REAL os conference, and I don't see MS there > > http://lca2007.linux.org.au/Sponsors and neither for oscon > > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2006/ nor for foss.in > > http://foss.in/2006/info/Main_Page > > past avatars of foss.in have had microsoft speakers - nothing wrong > there. But accepting microsoft sponsorship is a different kettle of > fish altogether > > > -- > regards > > Kenneth Gonsalves > Associate, NRC-FOSS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi > http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/ > _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
