Quoting Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Raj Mathur wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 18:15, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: > >> [snip] > >> I have a feeling that Kenneth is just asking for some facts behind > >> your theory of how BSD code is being abused by M$ and its ilk. Too > >> many people throw the "BSD networking stack" as an example whenever > >> this discussion comes up, but are at a loss when asked for examples > >> beyond that. > > > > Kerberos? > > > > This is again an old name just like the BSD stack theory. > > Besides, I am not sure what happened here. Did Microsoft use BSD > kerberos code? Or did they "embrace and extend" a known protocol and > then made it incompatible with other implementations? If it is the > latter, then it is not exactly a BSD license misuse, right? Even if I am > wrong here, I would urge you provide you the name of some tangible > independent project which has been abused.
i have gone through the kerberos web page - software looks alive and well to me. No developer seems to have committed suicide or gone bankrupt. The software appears to be widely used and in active development. So what is the problem? kg _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
