On 01-May-08, at 9:56 PM, Raj Mathur wrote: > ...neither of which statements has any bearing on the ``hackproof'' > label. Please, either substantiate (which is impossible) or withdraw > the original statement, because we sure don't want to give people here > the impression that any reasonably complex piece of software can be > ``hackproof''. Least of all a CMS with known vulnerabilities (in > other > words, it's been hacked, and I can provide proof... is that what you > meant? :)
please provide the proof > > In general, a piece of software may be more secure, it may have > fewer or > no known vulnerabilities, it may be well written, it may be crafted > with security in mind, excellent description of plone -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/code/ _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
