On Friday 02 May 2008, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On 01-May-08, at 9:56 PM, Raj Mathur wrote: > > ...neither of which statements has any bearing on the ``hackproof'' > > label. Please, either substantiate (which is impossible) or > > withdraw the original statement, because we sure don't want to give > > people here the impression that any reasonably complex piece of > > software can be ``hackproof''. Least of all a CMS with known > > vulnerabilities (in other > > words, it's been hacked, and I can provide proof... is that what > > you meant? :) > > please provide the proof
You really are a glutton for punishment, aren't you? http://www.google.com/search?q=bugtraq+plone If that isn't enough: http://www.newtechheroes.com/plone-vulnerability-being-exploited-on-unpatched-installations > > In general, a piece of software may be more secure, it may have > > fewer or > > no known vulnerabilities, it may be well written, it may be crafted > > with security in mind, > > excellent description of plone Yes, yes, we all know how to judiciously edit a quote so it seems to be saying something other than the original intended meaning and then reply to the distorted meaning! However, I'm sure you'll continue asserting that Plone is ``hackproof'' despite all the available evidence, so no more on this thread from me. Regards, -- Raju -- Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
