I'm assuming... but I don't know. 5.07 sends messages using the year 100. Anthony ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel M. Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 2:04 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Y2k bug > So does that mean that version 5.04 has a y2k bug as well? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Santen > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 12:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in Imail 5.x > > > version 6+ makes it WORSE. The most stable version is 5.07, but there is a > Y2K bug in that. > > mark > > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > to be removed from this list. > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list.
- [IMail Forum] SMTP security in Imail 5.x Scot Desort
- [IMail Forum] Web Messaging - 100% CPU.. Jason Kennedy
- Re: [IMail Forum] Web Messaging - 100% CPU.. Daniel Donnelly
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in Imail 5.x Anthony Santen
- RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in Imail 5.x Kelly Britt
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in Imail 5.x Anthony Santen
- [IMail Forum] Y2k bug Joel M. Bryant
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in ... Anthony Santen
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in Imail... Sales
- [IMail Forum] Global SPAM filtering... Jim Jones, Jr.
- Re: [IMail Forum] Global SPAM f... Madscientist
- Re: [IMail Forum] Global SPAM f... ## Dusty Carden
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in ... Anthony Santen
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP security... tom farrell
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP secu... Anthony Santen
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP security... Tanya M. DeScott
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP secu... Anthony Santen
- Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP secu... Tanya M. DeScott
