what i find wierd is that it just started.
we have been running 5.09 for some time now.
what cuold have gone wrong on allour systems at the same time to have it
start ???
At 01:08 PM 03/23/00 -0500, you wrote:
>version 6+ makes it WORSE. The most stable version is 5.07, but there is a
>Y2K bug in that.
>
>mark
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kelly Britt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 11:16 AM
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in Imail 5.x
>
>
>> Does 6.03 fix this? Has Ipswitch issued *any* response?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kelly Britt
>>
>> "Need A Dot Com?"
>> ____________________________________________________
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.needa.com 770-663-1535
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Santen
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 6:15 PM
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in Imail 5.x
>> >
>> >
>> > Scot,
>> > We're collecting customers who have this problem, as IPSWITCH claims
>it's
>> > NOT them, but everyone else.
>> >
>> > We have conclusively tested and proved that the problem 'goes away' if
>you
>> > use another software for SMTP AUTH.
>> >
>> > The problem lies in one of the following problems (or a combination)
>> >
>> > - File locking of IMAILSEC.DLL
>> > - Thread contingency within IMAILSEC.DLL
>> > - Timing issues regarding username - password table lookup
>> > - Resource locking during another operation
>> >
>> > We have now finally had to give up and use Sendmail for outgoing
>> > mail relay.
>> > Not pretty, but highly efficient.
>> >
>> > Anthony Santen
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Scot Desort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 5:05 PM
>> > Subject: [IMail Forum] SMTP security in Imail 5.x
>> >
>> >
>> > > We are running Imail 5.x. We have all along had SMTP relay
>> > security set to
>> > > relay for our IP blocks, and AUTH enabled for hosting customers who
>are
>> > > off-net.
>> > >
>> > > Suddenly, we had a rush of Netscape Messenger/Mail clients who suddenl
>y
>> > > where being asked to enter their password to send mail out. Going to
>the
>> > > Ipswitch KB, this is a known issue. The fix is to disable AUTH. This
>> > creates
>> > > a problem for our off-net hosting customers.
>> > >
>> > > I started to play around with the "relay mail for local users" choice.
>> > > Instead of restricting access by IP block, this would allow off-net
>> > hosting
>> > > customers to use our SMTP server, yet still prevent that AUTH error
>with
>> > > netscape.
>> > >
>> > > This is not an ideal solution, though. It still opens us up by
>allowing
>> > > someone to relay mail through us by simply specifying a valid user
>name.
>> > >
>> > > Has any else run across this situation? Is there a better way
>> > of handling
>> > > this? A new problem with this fix has cropped up. We outsource
>> > some of our
>> > > DSL. These customer often have their own mail servers. We now have to
>> > enter
>> > > those mail hosts and IP addresses into the accept.txt file. And
>> > since the
>> > > file does not take wildcards, well, you can see the problem
>> > becoming quite
>> > > cumbersome.
>> > >
>> > > Any thoughts??
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Scot
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>> > > to be removed from this list.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>> > to be removed from this list.
>> >
>>
>> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>> to be removed from this list.
>>
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>to be removed from this list.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
