Hello All,

   Not many positive things siad in this link lately, so I figured I would chime in!

   We are running a Dual Pent 400 machine with 256 mem and around 150 users.  One 
client has several lists that are pretty busy.  We installed IMail 5.0 in January of 
1999 and are currently running 6.02 without any problems what-so-ever.  Our main 
system log files run on average at about 3meg/day.  Mostly from the lists I believe.

   Not sure why others are having these, but (Knock on wood) we have had no problems.

Grant Griffith
http://www.getafreewebsite.com


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Tom Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:42:58 -0600

>I am having the same problem. I will have a number of smtp32.exe processes
>in my NT task list using 0% CPU, at this point the imail is looked up and I
>have to reboot my server. It always happens on large lists or when a number
>of smaller lists are being used at the same time.
>
>I upgraded to 6.02 from 5.x, no help, I tried changing the registry entry
>for max processes, nothing helps. Not stable at all.
>
>I'm running on a PIII 400 with 512Mb NT 4.0/SP5 and about 5,000 accounts.
>
>Please let me know if you find anything or if you move to another product
>(I'd like to evaluate it also).
>
>I can't/won't put up with this much longer!
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rubens Altimari
>Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 1:46 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail "takes control" of my link
>
>
>    The other day I thought IMail was taking too long to send e-mails to a
>list. That was nothing compared to what it did to my link!
>
>    I have a client who has about 10 different lists, each holding some 50
>users. Sometimes he sends one single e-mail for every list, so it must be
>about 500 users at a time. When this happens, IMail launches so many
>instances of smtp32.exe that my link is compromised!
>
>    Is there anything I can do about it? If I change the "Number of
>recipients per message" will it help? Is there any "bandwidth" registry
>setting or something like it?
>
>    Thanks in advance,
>
>Rubens
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>to be removed from this list.
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
>to be removed from this list.
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

Reply via email to