What are your (virtual memory) paging file size settings?
Dave
In reply to 29 Mar message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>I am having the same problem. I will have a number of
>smtp32.exe processes in my NT task list using 0% CPU, at this
>point the imail is looked up and I have to reboot my server.
>It always happens on large lists or when a number of smaller
>lists are being used at the same time.
>I upgraded to 6.02 from 5.x, no help, I tried changing the
>registry entry for max processes, nothing helps. Not stable
>at all.
>I'm running on a PIII 400 with 512Mb NT 4.0/SP5 and about
>5,000 accounts.
>Please let me know if you find anything or if you move to
>another product (I'd like to evaluate it also).
>I can't/won't put up with this much longer!
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Rubens Altimari Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 1:46 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail "takes control" of my link
> The other day I thought IMail was taking too long to send
>e-mails to a list. That was nothing compared to what it did
>to my link!
> I have a client who has about 10 different lists, each
>holding some 50 users. Sometimes he sends one single e-mail
>for every list, so it must be about 500 users at a time. When
>this happens, IMail launches so many instances of smtp32.exe
>that my link is compromised!
> Is there anything I can do about it? If I change the
>"Number of recipients per message" will it help? Is there any
>"bandwidth" registry setting or something like it?
> Thanks in advance,
>Rubens
>Please visit
>http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be
>removed from this list.
>Please visit
>http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be
>removed from this list.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
