But then we could relay spam all we wanted, as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or
some such, with only a password to crack. Wanna bet all your users have
good passwords?
--
--Cal Frye, Western Reserve Academy, Hudson, Ohio
"There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a
longer shelf life." - Frank Zappa
"A.J. Ostman" wrote:
>
> Quentin,
>
> (awwww) I wish I could talk in person to some of you. I realize how an
> IP address would eliminate the need for including the domain name in the
> username, but it seems to me that all the resolving can be done based on
> the username%domain, since the doman is included. Who cares what IP
> address it comes from? It has the necessary domain information in the
> USERNAME to validate it or not. I understand the IP problem if I was
> only providing the username, but since the username includes the DOMAIN
> name.. there should be no need to RESOLVE a host name from the
> connection, but it should be overriden by the domain name in the
> username.
>
> -A.J.
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
