Reply to: Mark Kahn
      Re: [IMail Forum] Rules performance hit on Wednesday 5:29:56 PM

When it is received on the server.

--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com


----- Copy of Original Message(s): -----

M> so do the rules filter when accessing a mailbox?  or when mail is received
M> by the server?

M> -Mark

M> ----- Original Message -----
M> From: "Roger Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
M> To: "Mark Kahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
M> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 6:23 PM
M> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Rules performance hit


>> Reply to: Mark Kahn
>>       Re: [IMail Forum] Rules performance hit on Wednesday 4:48:14 PM
>>
>> I  have asked this question here before without answers but I can
>> tell  you to watch out for the B~ body rule. If you have a lot of
>> these, they can make mail delivery last forever. We utilize a lot
>> of  rules and we now use both Imail rules and Declude rules. From
>> time  to  time  one  or  both  fail.  Sometimes Imail works where
>> Declude  doesn't and sometimes Declude works where Imail doesn't.
>> Overall  we  see  Declude  rules as substantially faster and much
>> more  versatile.  I  cannot imagine running Imail without Declude
>> any more. I think if you can get away without using the body rule
>> in  each, it is preferable. If you can utilize the kill.lst, that
>> is even more preferable.
>>
>> --
>> Roger Heath
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> www.rleeheath.com
>>
>>
>> ----- Copy of Original Message(s): -----
>>
>> M> I was wondering if anyone could tell me how much of a performance hit
M> the rules make on imail.  I currently have a fairly long rules file (200
M> rules or so) that's filtering a lot of spam for me
>> M> and a few other users (1 domain, about 10 users).  We're getting a lot
M> of requests to filter spam on other domains (about 3,000 users total in
M> roughly 50 domains) and I'm just worried that imail
>> M> might max the CPU if I add these rules to all the domains...any
M> insights?
>>
>> M> Thanks,
>> M> -Mark
>>
>> --
>> ActivatorMail(tm) ver.061902 Scanned for all viruses by
>> www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service
>>
>>
>> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>> to be removed from this list.
>>
>> An Archive of this list is available at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>>
>> Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
>> questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>>


M> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
M> to be removed from this list.

M> An Archive of this list is available at:
M> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

M> Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
M> questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
M> --
M> ActivatorMail(tm) ver.061902 Scanned for all viruses by 
M> www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service

--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.061902 Scanned for all viruses by 
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to