I didn't say it was perfect. :) Redundancy would require an aditional IMGate/VRFY box, but again they aren't using as many resources as any of the other boxes so you can skimp some, plus if it fails the end result would be the same as the other peer failing in an two Imail system. Of course as you pointed out, a single, properly licensed Imail box starts around $2200 ($400 box, $900 Win2k3, $894 Imail w/Service agreement), you can have 4 IMGate boxes for as little as $1600, maybe even less.
Thanks, Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Peering >The only solution that comes to mind is to have a routing host with vrfy >on behind the MX boxes, i.e. minimum of five servers, two IMGate MX, one >IMGate routing yep that would work but the IMGate/VRFY box sounds like a single point of failure Len _____________________________________________________________________ http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training: New York; Seattle; Chicago IMGate.MEIway.com: anti-spam gateway, effective on 1000's of sites, free To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
