Check out Computer Associates

 http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/SubSolution.asp?ID=312

-Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Standby Server

Hi All -

We're considering getting Legato Co-StandbyServerT Aadvanced for our SQL
server implementation.  It provides automated mirroring and failover if any
part of the server fails.  It swaps out IP addresses in the case of a
failure, so the standby server looks like the failed server to the outside
world.  As long as the data is kept synced, and the registry, I'm thinking
this could work for Imail, too.  The product apparently also worries about
keeping registry entries in sync.

http://portal2.legato.com/products/costandbyserver/

Our Imail implementation is simple.  Single box, using registry, no
clustering.  No shared storage.

We'd fail over to a box that was nearly identical.

Has anybody any thoughts on this, one way or another?  Any experience?

The archives are full of references to Legato Octopus, and they're generally
positive, but this product appears to go one or two steps beyond.

Thanks ahead of time.

Rob

==============================
www.iGive.com

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to