Scott,

If that's the case, and I'm sure it is, then instead of adding to the
problem just post a link to the solution.

Sincerely,

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments)


This is getting very, very silly.  More than 1/2 of the posts to the list 
today have been requests for this file that is a maximum of about 1K 
(probably much less), which is about 10% of the size of a one-line post 
from someone using Microsoft Word to write their E-mails.

People who are making these requests need to learn [1] how to read the list 
(if 50% of the posts today are asking the same thing, you've got to realize 
that posting a "me too" is only going to annoy people), and [2] how to 
respond directly to the sender (I know many mailserver admins don't realize 
that you can send an E-mail directly to the sender, but it's something 
you're going to have to learn if you want to run a mailserver).

Even sillier is that the archives probably have much more useful 
information than a filter by someone who only started posting to this list 
the day he offered to share his filter (no offense to him, but given how 
poorly some filters work on attachments, assuming that his is the best is 
silly).
                                           -Scott

At 02:43 PM 6/1/2004, Probert, Dave wrote:
>I would like a copy also,
>
>Thanks
>
>Dave Probert
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tony Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 10:45 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments)
>
>
>Please send me a copy...thanks.
>
>Tony Williams
>
>-------Original Message-------
>
>From: 
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: 06/01/04 10:35:26
>To: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments)
>
>Please send me a copy...thanks.
>
>Kris Hallman
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com 
>
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sophia Pitt
>Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 8:59 AM
>To: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments)
>
>Please send me a copy as well.
>
>Thank You
>
>
>Sophia
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com 
>
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
>Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:42 AM
>To: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments)
>
>Todd,
>
>I would also like a copy...
>
>David
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com 
>
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Bierbaum
>Sent: Friday, 21 May, 2004 17:13
>To: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments)
>
>
>I totally agree.  I have a nice long rule that filters over 57 
>dangerous file attachments.  The exact list was obtained from a open 
>source program called MIMEdefang.
>
>I have been working with IPSwitch support to resolve an issue with the 
>when the e-mail matches the rule, if forwards it on to an e-mail 
>address.  The problem I'm having is that it's truncating the first 14 
>characters of the e-mail address that I specify. The rule works when I 
>set to bounce, but I want my outgoing rules to replay back to my 
>senders and notify them that they can't send that attachment.
>
>ANYWAY, I would be glad to provide a copy of these rules to anyone who 
>is interested.
>
>Todd Bierbaum - Microsoft Certified Professional
>BankTrust
>office 850-835-3335 ext 106
>cell 850-598-3993
>-=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=-
>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
>intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they 
>are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 
>the system manager and the sender.
>-=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=- -=~=-
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com 
>
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris 
>Langsenkamp
>Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 12:42 AM
>To: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments)
>
>
>I wish more mail admins would take bad mail seriously, and virus scan 
>both inbound and outbound for viruses an other assorted trash. We're 
>more tuned in, and more likely to have better, more up-to-date 
>software, and frankly we have to have it anyway on our systems for our 
>own protection, so scanning the mail that moves through our system 
>should cost us very little, and benefits so many ...many beyond our own 
>individual customer bases.
>
>One of these days mail admins will unite and put the RFC's and 
>standards up on a pedestal, maybe fixing what we collectively think is 
>broken, and then we'll say to the world, "There - comply or you can't 
>function with anyone!  We're not gonna tolerate it any more!"  
>Legislation doesn't kill spam or network abuse, but lazy administration 
>and over-tolerance to bent/broken rules and standards has contributed 
>to the problem.  If we stand together and draw a line in the sand a lot 
>of things might stop, or at least be laregley reduced...
>
>One of these days I'll get the attic cleaned out too......fat chance 
>either way....
>
>Chris
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Matrosity Tech Support
>To: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:56 PM
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments)
>
>
>It's interesting that we (ISP's) have been roped into taking care of 
>Viruses for our customers rather than them paying for their own 
>Antivirus software.
>
>I resolved the problem by deleting any email that comes in with 
>attachments with the common problem extensions.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com 
>
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Geater 
>5/3/04
>Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:48 PM
>To: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blocking Com Extensions (Attachments)
>
>
> > RE: "If I needed to send someone a legitimate "dot" exe file, I 
> > change
>
> > the extension to "ex_" before I send it, since my recipient would be 
> > expecting the file to arrive anyway."
> >
> > I wish all users were like this but.. alas... they are not :(
>
>Actually, I have a rationale that says none of my users need "dot" exe 
>files.
>
>In the Windows 98 world, where all this originated, it made sense to 
>block them because they would execute and install without 
>administrative privilege.  Now that all my 2k and XP users are set up 
>as "less than administrator", it's not so much an issue anymore.
>
>However, I have noticed that more ISPs use Imail than I originally 
>expected. In that line of work, you have to have that clearinghouse, I 
>suppose, else your customers get really bent.
>
>
>To Unsubscribe:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html>http://www.ipswitch.com
/support/mailing-lists.html 
>
>List Archive: 
><http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/>http://ww
>w.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>Knowledge Base/FAQ:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/>http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMa
il/
>
>
>To Unsubscribe:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html>http://www.ipswitch.com
/support/mailing-lists.html 
>
>List Archive: 
><http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/>http://ww
>w.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>Knowledge Base/FAQ:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/>http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMa
il/
>
>
>To Unsubscribe:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html>http://www.ipswitch.com
/support/mailing-lists.html 
>
>List Archive: 
><http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/>http://ww
>w.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>Knowledge Base/FAQ:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/>http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMa
il/
>
>
>To Unsubscribe:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html>http://www.ipswitch.com
/support/mailing-lists.html 
>
>List Archive: 
><http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/>http://ww
>w.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>Knowledge Base/FAQ:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/>http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMa
il/
>
>
>To Unsubscribe:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html>http://www.ipswitch.com
/support/mailing-lists.html 
>
>List Archive: 
><http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/>http://ww
>w.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>Knowledge Base/FAQ:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/>http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMa
il/
>
>
>
>
>To Unsubscribe:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html>http://www.ipswitch.com
/support/mailing-lists.html 
>
>List Archive: 
><http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/>http://ww
>w.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>Knowledge Base/FAQ:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/>http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMa
il/
>
>
>To Unsubscribe:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html>http://www.ipswitch.com
/support/mailing-lists.html 
>
>List Archive:
><http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/>http://www.ma
il-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
>
>Knowledge Base/FAQ:
><http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/>http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMa
il/
>
>.
>
>"The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's 
>business
>confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
>addressee(s). Access to this internet electronic mail message by anyone 
>else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
>disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
>taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful."
>
>"The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of 
>any
>virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message 
>and its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By 
>reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts 
>full responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about 
>viruses and other defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any 
>loss or damage arising in any way from this message or its attachments."

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to