Quote from ASTA press release:

"The zombie problem, said representatives of the group, is going largely
UNCHECKED because other Internet providers ARE NOT TAKING SUCH ACTION."

Did any of these people acknowledge that THEY are part of the problem?

Let's see:

yahoo
aol.com
earhtlink
ms/msn

For one large west coast mailbox provider where I run greylisting on their MX, there have been 37K unique IPs greylisted (greylist behavior being a good, if incomplete, indicator of zombie mailers) over the preceding 3 days.

Of those 37K, here are the counts by ASTA domain name:

ipt.aol.com 496  (AOL subcriber PTR)

yahoo.com 6

earthlink.net 44

msn.com 4

microsoft.com   3

sbc.com 3

so the ASTA first movers are not big zombie-as-greylisted violators. Now, for the real culprits:

charter 917
comcast 2609
verizon 1858
rr.com 989
attbi 700
adelphia 439
mindspring 272
net.br and com.br 2168
net.br and com.ar 347
hinet 410
bellsouth 268
mchsi 148
telus 247
videotron 261
pacbell 1026
ameritech 925
swbell 924
shawcable 679
etc....

So I would say the nets which those 4 ASTA members are running are not that big of a problem, while cable/dsl/dialup networks dominate.

Why didn't they take the gloves off

They're corps with huge legal departments. You won't get much teeth in their bite, if they ever get beyond the barking.


What we want to hear is that 1 to 4 of these biggies block all of rr.com, or attbi.com or verizon, etc, etc. THEN the bite would be on.

A little negative press goes a long way.  I mean come on.  How many times
have we heard "There is a problem
with spam, we are going to try and do something about it." ?

exactly. ASTA is clearly an movement of exasperation. That's why Scottt's multi-month contact+warn approach is just silly at this point.


  BS, let
everyone know that it's Comcast, Swbell, At&t,
and the other mega companies that have no clue how to properly police a
network.

don't assume they don't have a clue. I assume they have the means, but it costs to implement, and right now, it's NOT costing them anything NOT to implement policing.


ASTA's punitive "block 'em" is intended to make not policing their networks a very costly, and publicly negative, stance.

Len


_____________________________________________________________________ http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training : Denver; NYC; San Jose http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of sites


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to