Yes, I believe that is what he's talking about. That is one I haven't looked
at just yet, hope we may not need to after tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of x
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 9:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team

Are you speaking of Deersoft's mail server?

Bruce Barnes wrote:
> If anyone would like to have a test mailbox setup to play with, please 
> let me know and we will send you a username and password off list.
>  
> PS:  All connections, including web, are SECURE and the e-mail server 
> automatically attempts a secure connection to deliver mail before 
> attempting a non-secure connection.
>  
> Bruce
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Bruce
Barnes
>     *Sent:* Saturday, October 30, 2004 20:30
>     *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     *Subject:* RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch
>     Executive Team
> 
>     1.  almost who is using Challenge/Response LOVED the service.  They
>     have the option, on a user-by-user basis, to turn it off.
>      
>     IMHO, it is a very GOOD thing and is overwhelmingly liked by the
>     administrations of the three school systems I talked to.
>      
>     Addresses can be PRE-LISTED (as many lists are now telling people to
>     do when they have accessed a web site that will send a message from
>     a machine and even supplying the e-mail address to do so.
>      
>     Until all of the in-fighting over SPF, CALLER-ID (microsuck's name
>     for their re-worked and re-launched version of SPF) is resolved and
>     universally adopted, the next best thing is CHALLENGE/RESPONSE.
>      
>      
>      1.  As far as the pricing goes, that includes all updates, all
>     support and it can be purchased for a lot less, just like IMail,
>     from 3rd party resellers.
>      
>      2. They support ANY anti-virus that does dos level scanning,
>     including Norton Corporate edition.
>      
>      3.  The new version supports SPF
>      
>      4. They support calendaring
>      
>      5.  They support LISTS and will allow the direct import of Imail
lists.
>      
>      6. They support ODBC connectivity.
>      
>      7. They support unlimited domains and users
>      
>      8.  They support IM from the web based client without an added
>     cost,  IM is setup by default to be BY INVITATION ONLY.
>      
>      9.  They supply a tool to migrate Imail, both users and mail.
>      
>     10.  They support the ability to archive all incoming and outgoing
>     messages for anyone who must comply with Sarbaines-Oxley - that's
>     ALL financial institution, insurance companies, and all publicly
>     held corporations.  Incidently SmarterMail CANNOT do Sarbaines-Oxley
>     archiving - I already talked to their sales department.
>      
>     11. The e-mail server can automatically back up all of the e-mail
>     and users on a regular schedule.
>      
>     12.  ANY feature can be DISABLED on a USER-BY-USER or
>     DOMAIN-BY-DOMAIN basis.
>      
>     I'll gladly pay a little more for a customer service department that
>     actually answers their phones and responds in less than 10 minutes
>     with a solution and who will stay on the phone with you, like Dell
>     (and like Compaq used to before they off-shored everything to India
>     with a bunch of people who have no technical background and don't
>     know the names or anything about any of their own certified techs)
>     for several hours at a time until a problem is resolved.
>      
>     Yes, gentlemen and women, if we want 1st class tech support that is
>     maintained in the United States of America then we have to be
>     willing to PAY for it.  Just like we are available to our customers
>     24 hours a day, 7 days a week and are willing to bend over backwards
>     to resolve a problem, so are these people.  And this is not
>     conjecture, but from the mouths of people who have actually used the
>     product and had to deal with the support people.
>      
>     Bruce Barnes
>     ChicagoNetTech Inc
> 
>         -----Original Message-----
>         *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>         [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *John
>         Tolmachoff (Lists)
>         *Sent:* Saturday, October 30, 2004 18:48
>         *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>         *Subject:* RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the
>         Ipswitch Executive Team
> 
>         Bruce wrote:
> 
>         /In addition to everything we've looking for, it auto-verifies
>         any incoming e-mail message the first time a message is received
>         from a new e-mail address and forces the sender to click on a
>         link in the verification message to validate they are a person
>         and not a machine./
> 
>         // 
> 
>         /To see an example, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>         <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and the server will send a verify
>         message back./
> 
>          
> 
>         Bad server, bad server. Search the archives for
>         Challenge/Response. Bad!
> 
>          
> 
>         **John Tolmachoff**
> 
>         **Engineer/Consultant/Owner**
> 
>         **eServices For You**
> 
>                      
> 


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to