Hi Mark

I downloaded imap 2006h, compiled and installed it, then recompiled mixcvt against this version of imap. With the same error message. Could you point me to the code that's doing this so I can try and track down the problem?

thanks
nancy
-------------------------------------
Nancy Lin                        DECF
1109A Etcheverry Hall    510-642-7291
Office Hours:         2PM-4PM Mon-Thu
-------------------------------------


Mark Crispin wrote:
Hi Nancy -

You misunderstood. The bug fixed on January 18, 2007 was in the mix driver in the IMAP toolkit, not in mixcvt.

mixcvt is simply reporting that it encountered a mailbox that was impacted by that old, now fixed, bug.

On Tue, 1 May 2007, nlin wrote:

Hi Mark

That's kind of strange. I only download mixcvt on 4/17 and the mixcvt.c file has the following line:

Last Edited: 14 April 2007

I also just downloaded and compiled the Apr 23rd version and that one gave me the same error.

These mailboxes are big. That's why I wanted to convert them. One is about 500MB and the other 625MB. I'm currently running the 2006f version of imapd. Do I need to upgrade 2006g?

nancy

-------------------------------------
Nancy Lin                        DECF
1109A Etcheverry Hall    510-642-7291
Office Hours:         2PM-4PM Mon-Thu
-------------------------------------


Mark Crispin wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, nlin wrote:
warning: Inconsistency in mix message size, uid=0000150d (20987904 != 2098899

This message indicates a repair of a damage caused by a known bug in earlier versions of the mix driver. I think that you omitted a digit from the end of the second value. Assuming that to be the case, the message is stored in the index as having 20,987,904 bytes (exactly 20496K) whereas the message was supposed to have 20,988,99x bytes. Thus, between 1086 and 1095 bytes from the end of the message were lost.

The bug was one in which a final buffer's worth of bytes would not be written to the mailbox on append if the number of iterations through the message copy loop (64K at a time) exceeded the number of bytes remaining to be written to the message. The larger the message, the more likely this bug was to bite. It was fixed on January 18, 2007.

Is this similar to the data length error that was posted on the mailing list the other day?

The "data length error" problem was a bug in the traditional UNIX format driver. That too is fixed.

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
Imap-uw@u.washington.edu
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw

Reply via email to