What's the best course of action in this case? I've already lost the
original mailbox so I cannot reconvert from the original. Should I just
leave the mailbox along or would converting it using mixcvt (I would like
the .mix files split nicely instead of one huge 600MB file) make that
message unreadable?
thanks
nancy
-------------------------------------
Nancy Lin DECF
1109A Etcheverry Hall 510-642-7291
Office Hours: 2PM-4PM Mon-Thu
-------------------------------------
Mark Crispin wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, nlin wrote:
I also just had a thought. If the problem is in the imap toolkit,
does this mean that mailutil would not have worked properly as well?
So that if I converted a user's mailbox from either unix format or mbx
format to the mixfmt using pre 1/18/07 version, it would have
corrected the mailbox?
The bug was in the pre 1/18/07 mix code, so a mailutil based on that
code would have done this minor corruption with very large messages.
mixcvt never has the bug. When it reports the warning, it is saying
thagt it saw the problem in the mailbox from the buggy version.
-- Mark --
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
Imap-uw@u.washington.edu
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
