On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Vadim Zeitlin <vz-ccli...@zeitlins.org>wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:42:38 +0100 Robert Raschke <rtrli...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > RR> Err, how about just using folders? Name one of them Trash. You move > stuff to > RR> Trash if you want to "keep" it, and you delete messages you don't. > > This is exactly what I do except that "deleting" moves stuff to this Trash > folder and "permanently deleting" really deletes it in place. Mark seems to > think that this is anti-IMAP and shouldn't be done like this, I was curious > to find what was he suggesting to do. Unfortunately I still don't > understand > what was it. > > Right, I did indeed mean "move", not "delete". It's a different use, and not trying to overload "delete" to mean "well, you know, kinda delete, but not really, just put it over there until I say delete again, so's you know I really meant it". Just use move when you don't want to delete! Everything is then just bog standard IMAP. Robby PS I guess I'm sounding a wee bit sarcastic, I hope I don't offend too much.
_______________________________________________ Imap-uw mailing list Imap-uw@u.washington.edu http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
