I worked this summer on an addressing project - all the addresses were
points. In OSM I've seen discussion on relating the address to a
structure or putting an address on a structure - I would rather keep it
as a point within the structure (and not relating it to the building) -
but that's just me. I believe you are just keeping the address as a
point and not relating it to a structure (I've been trying to keep up
with your import as a matter of interest).
Good luck on getting this done by the way.
Randy
-----------------
Randal Hale, GISP
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 rjh...@northrivergeographic.com
<mailto:rjh...@northrivergeographic.com>
twitter:rjhale
http://about.me/rjhale
On 11/24/2013 11:26 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:10:48AM -0500, Randal Hale wrote:
What's the benefit of tying the address to the structure? I've seen
this spoken about quite a bit.
I'm not sure I understand your question. Why would you want to
have a node with the address information when you can do it on
the building? A _house_ number is a number for a house, so it
seems obvious to me to add that number to the house.
Kurt
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
Imports@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
