> No, I'm explaining my position, since I was
> criticized earlier for not
> doing that. I'm not at all opposed to multiple
> distributions as long as
> they're compatible with each other.
...
> "OpenSolaris" has to mean something more than just "a
> pile of code".

The biggest obstacle here, as I see it, is that Sun has created a situation 
where the name "OpenSolaris" is no longer solely theirs to use. It belongs to 
the community. If you get OGB approval for use of the name OpenSolaris, i.e. 
some kind of community consensus, then that's great.

If you had started off with a binary distribution, even with some non-free 
binaries, called OpenSolaris then the community would have formed around the 
distribution. 

At the moment we have "a community + some source code + some closed binaries on 
a relaxed distribution licence" called OpenSolaris, and a binary distro 
(Nevada) owned by Sun, derived from OpenSolaris, downloadable from the 
OpenSolaris website, but not actually OpenSolaris itself. Our de facto 
reference platform is Sun's Solaris. We need the de facto reference platform to 
be community owned, otherwise this debate about Sun owning the (community + 
platform) will always be with us. OpenSolaris is the community. So logically 
the reference platform needs to be named OpenSolaris.

OpenSolaris needs to be the platform, otherwise what is the name of the 
platform - ON? OS/Net? Polaris, MyUdix (TM)? what? Why would you want to invent 
a new name, when OpenSolaris is by far the most recognisable tag the (community 
+ code + binaries) already has?

My own preference for which distro I would like to see become the reference 
platform would be Belenix since, in my view, it shows most clearly the way the 
platform needs to evolve. By that I mean: 1. Live CD/DVD/USB key, 2. Improved 
interoperability with other OSes, 3. Nice eye candy (*never* underestimate the 
eye candy), 4. Compatibility with Sun's distro. 5. Fixing some of the 
brain-dead stuff in Sun's distro (default password hashing algorithm "broken as 
designed", no command completion, the ^H bug, ....).

Andrew.
--

This message posted from opensolaris.org

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to