On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Peter Tribble wrote:
On 6/26/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree, and perhaps all these thoughts need to get down on paper, and
start
fleshing out the details. We need to, I believe, get to a stage where we
are
producing bits that people can download and install. It might not be fully
functional, but it's a defined release and something that people can base
their
work around.
By people, what's the target audience at this stage? I think my question is
really whether the first "release" is aimed at users, or whether there should
be a 0.0 "release" solely for the purpose of Indiana bootstrapping?
Good question. So that raises the issue of "non-emancipated"
(non-redistributable) files. That is, should there be a 0.0 or 0.1
release that includes them in it? (I vote no, FWIW.)
And if not, wouldn't that be the main constraint here?
Eric
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
