On 01/08/07, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
> > On 26/06/07, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
> >> > On 26/06/07, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Peter Tribble wrote:
> >> >> > By people, what's the target audience at this stage? I think my
> >> question
> >> >> is
> >> >> > really whether the first "release" is aimed at users, or whether there
> >> >> should
> >> >> > be a 0.0 "release" solely for the purpose of Indiana bootstrapping?
> >> >>
> >> >> Good question. So that raises the issue of "non-emancipated"
> >> >> (non-redistributable) files. That is, should there be a 0.0 or 0.1
> >> >> release that includes them in it? (I vote no, FWIW.)
> >> >>
> >> >> And if not, wouldn't that be the main constraint here?
> >> >
> >> > Non-emancipated is not the same as non-redistributable. Remember that
> >> > there are binary "blobs" that are redistributable. There are several
> >> > files right now that can be redistributed but have not been
> >> > emancipated that are very important for the basic system. (libm.so
> >> > comes to mind... I think).
> >>
> >> Yes, thanks. I meant non-redistributable.
> >
> > I don't even know that we have a list of what is non-redistributable.
> > I would have to agree that is probably a pretty important point for
> > the first release. That way the iso can be downloaded, shared, and
> > mirrored everywhere.
>
> I agree, and even more so now in light of the distro constructor project.
>
> >
> > I know there is a list of what is "encumbered", but is anyone aware of
> > a list of what it isn't redistributable?
> >
>
> There's a place where this is tabulated now:
>      http://opensolaris.org/os/about/no_source/

That is a list of what's encumbered, not what isn't redistributable.
The SPARC disassembler, as an example, is redistributable under the
OBL (opensolaris binary license), but has no source, and is therefore
encumbered.

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. " --Donald Knuth
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to