Alberto Ruiz wrote: > 2007/7/5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > SMF is not overkill for indiana. > > it might be overkill to instantiate quite the number of SMF services > that > a full-blown solaris installation does at first-boot, but SMF itself is > incredibly useful. ;) > > I think that a lot of people find SMF frustrating because they think > it's slow due to the prohibitive number of services that Solaris and > Solaris Express boot by default. Maybe we should try to keep as less as > possible services for Indiana? Does that makes sense?
Is this something we should add to the list, i.e., investigate the services started at boot time to determine which aren't necessary and can be removed? I haven't noticed a problem with speed here aside from the first boot (which does take an inordinately long time--what on earth is it doing exactly?). -ian -- Ian Murdock 650-331-9324 http://ianmurdock.com/ "Don't look back--something might be gaining on you." --Satchel Paige _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
