On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Josh Hurst wrote: > >> ... /bin/sh needs to be replaced. >> >> >>> and /usr/gnu/bin/sh becomes a symlink to >>> /bin/bash... What's wrong with that? >> >> It won't help makefiles, users of system() and popen()... > > > Understood. As always, there are tradeoffs either way. > > We disagree on which set of tradeoffs is best. >
I suppose there's also the option of coding (and constantly maintaining) a version of bash that is fully compatible with both bash and sh, and making that /bin/sh. Eric _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
