On 8/8/07, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Understood. As always, there are tradeoffs either way. > > We disagree on which set of tradeoffs is best. > > Eric >
SXDE falls on one side of the trade-off that says a decade old features should continue to work as is because there are customers paying for the bread & butter of Sun engineers and SXDE being next Solaris version in the making it should remain in the path. Indiana falls on the other side of the trade-off where people are *craving* for a desktop at home, personal use, more feature reach user land utilities. Indiana is starting with a fresh slate and is able to open up newer possibilities. If it falls on the same side of trade-off as SXDE and is bound by the same constraints and ARC review uses the same scale, then I am sorry to say *Indiana does not need to exist*. -Shiv _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
