Dave Miner wrote: > Praveen Kumar wrote: >> So, can I safely assume that Indiana means Sun's OpenSolaris present >> and future binary distribution releases? OpenSolaris 2008.11 can be >> addressed as Indiana 2008.11 and we would have Indiana 2009.05 after >> that? I completely understand that "OpenSolaris" itself is the >> official trademark for the distribution. However it may be informally >> addressed as Indiana? > Indiana remains the project producing those releases, so as long as > that's what you're referring to, it would be correct. Using > release-specific nomenclature is likely to be more useful for most > references, though.
Oh, okay! So, indiana-discuss wouldn't be an end-user list, right? This would be a place where developers of the binary release discuss? Praveen _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
