Dave Miner wrote:
Evan Layton wrote:
On May 26, 2009, at 11:59 PM, "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Evan Layton <[email protected]>
wrote:
That doesn't mean you can't fake one up outside of beadm as
suggested below
however that's not a supported method for creating BE's. Plus the
ability to
do this will probably be impacted going forwad as more BE validation is
added to beadm. We will likely not support BE's created outside
beadm once
that validation work is complete. (see bug 891)
I see. So what is the recommended method of using the same zpool for
multiple OS?
Is it by creating a BE using beadm and overwriting its content? Or is
this completely unsupported, and we should have one pool for each OS?
--
Fajar
I don't know of any support for installing multiple OS's in the same
pool.
I'm not sure I understand what problem is being solved by attempting
to install multiple OS's in the same pool.
We have RFE's for this sort of installation; I expect we will implement
it because it is a viable transition strategy, especially from Solaris
10 updates with ZFS.
OK that makes sense.
We already have the needed support in libbe's be_init. Exposing it at
the CLI would be fairly simple.
This is true. I was just trying to understand if there was a way to solve
the problem they're hitting now with the current bits.
Dave
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
