Dear all, If plant is different surely they will have some differences i guess...
I think every one will agree that M. paniculata present in the wild as well as in cultivation whereas M. exotica or M. paniculata var. exotica or cv of M. paniculata whatever we say its commonly cultivated in the garden for the glossy laeves and beautiful flowers.. if its cv than who had made it???? no doubt they are different and in Maharashtra both can seen very commonly,, those who eager to see the species can visit Amboli, Mahabaleshwar, Mathera, Pune, Bhimashankar etc places to see M. paniculata and M. exotica in Nashik garden, Mumbai (Rani baug, Bombay trust garden, Gorai, Sanjay Gandhi National Park in Plantation near pond,, etc etc..), Kolhapur, Pune garden.. etc etc. regards, On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Mahadeswara ji > For that that matter all species which have been described on the basis of > different holotypes would be different species, because they will have some > differences. If we have that concept there would be no heterotypic synonyms > and we will have more than 5 lac species of angiosperms on this Earth, > whereas most authors agree on this number being below 3 lacs. As I have > written earlier also Hortus Third (considered Bible for cultivated plants), > The Plant List, now even GRIN, and numerous other publications treat them as > synonyms, and we would be doing little service to ignore them. > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Mahadeswara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree with Vijayasankar ji and H.S.ji. Both are different >> species. Both these species are available in IIT Madras Campus and >> C L R I Campus, Adyar Chennai. While the M. paniculata is wild, >> M.exotica is cultivated. In photograph both the plants look like. >> Unfortunately, I am not in Chennai now. I had the photographs of >> both. I will try to dig out from the archives in due course and post >> it to the group (depends on getting the photographs) >> >> On Jul 26, 6:40 am, Balkar Arya <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Dear All >> > *Murraya paniculata* >> > *Family Rutaceae >> > * >> > *From Garden of PIET Campus Samalkha Panipat >> > *-- >> > Regards >> > >> > Dr Balkar Singh >> > Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology >> > Arya P G College, Panipat >> > Haryana-132103 >> > 09416262964 >> > >> > Murraya paniculata (1).JPG >> > 175KViewDownload >> > >> > Murraya paniculata (2).JPG >> > 258KViewDownload >> > >> > Murraya paniculata (3).JPG >> > 240KViewDownload >> > >> > Murraya paniculata (4).JPG >> > 180KViewDownload >> > >> > Murraya paniculata (5).JPG >> > 214KViewDownload >> > >> > Murraya paniculata (6).JPG >> > 186KViewDownload >> > >> > Murraya paniculata (7).JPG >> > 201KViewDownload >> > > > > -- - H.S. A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of stone
