sorry sir, but i cant ignore the characters like many are doing.. Putting some name under synonym means treating that as a similar plant species... and i find no reason to call it similar.. may be someones taxonomic world found a reason to call it similar..
please one question.. Why earlier Good Taxonomist treated them different species or kept under Variety.. thanks.. On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Nothing can help one who does not want to see reason. Who can stop me if I > insist on believing that whole taxonomic World is wrong. Let those who want > to live in their World be so. > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:06 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> If plant is different surely they will have some differences i guess... >> >> I think every one will agree that M. paniculata present in the wild as >> well as in cultivation whereas M. exotica or M. paniculata var. exotica or >> cv of M. paniculata whatever we say its commonly cultivated in the garden >> for the glossy laeves and beautiful flowers.. if its cv than who had made >> it???? no doubt they are different and in Maharashtra both can seen very >> commonly,, those who eager to see the species can visit Amboli, >> Mahabaleshwar, Mathera, Pune, Bhimashankar etc places to see M. paniculata >> and M. exotica in Nashik garden, Mumbai (Rani baug, Bombay trust garden, >> Gorai, Sanjay Gandhi National Park in Plantation near pond,, etc etc..), >> Kolhapur, Pune garden.. etc etc. >> >> regards, >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Mahadeswara ji >>> For that that matter all species which have been described on the basis >>> of different holotypes would be different species, because they will have >>> some differences. If we have that concept there would be no heterotypic >>> synonyms and we will have more than 5 lac species of angiosperms on this >>> Earth, whereas most authors agree on this number being below 3 lacs. As I >>> have written earlier also Hortus Third (considered Bible for cultivated >>> plants), The Plant List, now even GRIN, and numerous other publications >>> treat them as synonyms, and we would be doing little service to ignore them. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>> Retired Associate Professor >>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Mahadeswara <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with Vijayasankar ji and H.S.ji. Both are different >>>> species. Both these species are available in IIT Madras Campus and >>>> C L R I Campus, Adyar Chennai. While the M. paniculata is wild, >>>> M.exotica is cultivated. In photograph both the plants look like. >>>> Unfortunately, I am not in Chennai now. I had the photographs of >>>> both. I will try to dig out from the archives in due course and post >>>> it to the group (depends on getting the photographs) >>>> >>>> On Jul 26, 6:40 am, Balkar Arya <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Dear All >>>> > *Murraya paniculata* >>>> > *Family Rutaceae >>>> > * >>>> > *From Garden of PIET Campus Samalkha Panipat >>>> > *-- >>>> > Regards >>>> > >>>> > Dr Balkar Singh >>>> > Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology >>>> > Arya P G College, Panipat >>>> > Haryana-132103 >>>> > 09416262964 >>>> > >>>> > Murraya paniculata (1).JPG >>>> > 175KViewDownload >>>> > >>>> > Murraya paniculata (2).JPG >>>> > 258KViewDownload >>>> > >>>> > Murraya paniculata (3).JPG >>>> > 240KViewDownload >>>> > >>>> > Murraya paniculata (4).JPG >>>> > 180KViewDownload >>>> > >>>> > Murraya paniculata (5).JPG >>>> > 214KViewDownload >>>> > >>>> > Murraya paniculata (6).JPG >>>> > 186KViewDownload >>>> > >>>> > Murraya paniculata (7).JPG >>>> > 201KViewDownload >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> - H.S. >> >> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of >> stone >> >> > > > -- - H.S. A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of stone
