Pankaj ji
But interestingly Xanthium strumarium (without any author) is accepted name
according to the Plant List, with X. chinense Mill. as synonym I am tired of
pointing out corrections to them.


-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Dr Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>wrote:

> There are many provisions in ICBN to conserve names which may actually
> be wrong.
> Article 14.2.of ICBN says, "Conservation aims at retention of those
> names which best serve stability of nomenclature".
> Stability like, the name of family Orchidaceae Juss., Gen. Pl.: 64. 4
> Aug 1789. is conserved against Orchidaceae Adanson, Fam. des plantes
> 2: 68 1763.
>
> Just based on the popularity of usage, Xanthium indicum may be
> considered conserved, but it is not yet conserved, as atleast the
> plant list or GRIN doesnt consider them as same.
>
> For this particular case, it is yet to be resolved according to The
> Plant List and both are till now considered distinct species with
> Xanthium indicum Roxb. is an unresolved name but synonymous with
> Xanthium inaequilaterum DC..
>
> WHEREAS
>
> Xanthium strumarium L. Sp. Pl. 987 1753 is an unresolved name.
>
> Regards
> Pankaj
>
>
>
> On Oct 20, 2:25 am, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Agreed it has to be vice versa. Thanks for pointing out that. Even The
> plant
> > list has something else to say. I cant go  more deeper in that context.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Satish ji
> > > Yes the identification is correct, but I fail to understand how
> Xanthium
> > > strumarium, a much earlier name be synonym and X. indicum, the accepted
> name
> >
> > > --
> > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> > > Retired  Associate Professor
> > > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> > > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> > > Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> > >http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> > >> *Xanthium indicum* Syn *Xanthium strumarium*
> > >> Family : Asteraceae
> > >> Marathi : Shankeshwar शंकेश्वर A vweed common on roadside
> > >> Observed flowering in open areas around Pune city last few days
> > >> Large herb Annual about 1m in height.
> > >> Stem branches rough hairy.
> > >> Leaves serrate alternate 5-8 cm ovate acute triangular or lobed'
> appressed
> > >> hairy.
> > >> Flower heads 0.4-0.8mm across. Green when young in terminal and
> axillary
> > >> spikes.Barren heads crowded at apex. Fertile heads fewer.
> > >> Fruits 2cm long with 2 erect mucronate beaks covered with hooked
> prickles.
> > >> Achenes 1cm bye 0.4 cm oblong or ovoid. Compressed black.
> >
> > >> --
> > >> Dr Satish Phadke
> >
> > --
> > Dr Satish Phadke
>

Reply via email to