The second level seems similar to the notion of svataḥ pramāṇa.

Howard

> On Jun 8, 2024, at 10:10 PM, Shrinivasa Varakhedi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear All 
> 
> This is very pertinent question in the context of verification process of 
> truthfulness of knowledge. Infinite regress or anavasthaa is a problem for 
> all philosophers for which Nyaya also tries to find an answer. In fact it is 
> a very serious problem in Nyaya. In order resolve this Nyaya school considers 
> two step higher order in knowledge. As per this agreement, a cognitive event 
> could be grasped only if it is desired so at secondary level. First level 
> cognition is cognised by second one but second one need not be compulsorily 
> cognised. Therefore no need of another cognition which will lead to Anavastha 
> otherwise. 
> 
> Prof.Shrinivasa Varakhedi 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 at 7:18 AM, Howard Resnick via INDOLOGY 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Andrea Lorene Gutierrez kindly pointed out to me that ‘atiprasṅga’, a 
>> synonym of anavasthā, is found in Yoga-sūtra 4.21
>> cittāntara-dṛśye buddhi-buddher atiprasaṅgaḥ smṛti-saṅkaraś ca
>> 
>> Best,
>> Howard
>> 
>> > On Jun 6, 2024, at 2:42 AM, Brendan S. Gillon, Prof. via INDOLOGY 
>> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Dear colleagues,
>> > 
>> > I am travelling now and so cannot check this, however, I have a note to
>> > the effect that `anavasthaa' is mentioned as a fault in Pata~njali's
>> > Mahaabhaa.sya to A 2.1.1. My source is Esther Solomon's Indian
>> > Dialectics 1976 p. 29. (I failed to note whether the page is in the
>> > first volume or in the second.)
>> > 
>> > Best wishes,
>> > Brendan
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On 2024-06-04 06:18, Franco via INDOLOGY wrote:
>> >> Dear Howard,
>> >> The earliest surviving example is probably in the Vigrahavyavartani, 
>> >> where the possibility of pramanas being proved by other pramanas is 
>> >> rejected because this would lead to an infinite regress. Most scholars 
>> >> think that Nagarjuna argues there agains the Nyaya, but I take the 
>> >> opponent to be an Abhidharmika.
>> >> Best wishes,
>> >> Eli
>> >> 
>> >> Sent from my iPad
>> >> 
>> >>> On 04.06.2024, at 11:05, Howard Resnick via INDOLOGY 
>> >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>> Dear Scholars,
>> >>> 
>> >>> Does the nyāya system speak about the problem of an infinite regress of 
>> >>> proofs? Aristotle famously identifies and then avoids this problem 
>> >>> through the notion of a self-evident foundation or starting point of 
>> >>> knowledge. In Western epistemology, this strategy is often called 
>> >>> foundationalism.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Is there anything at all similar or analagous in nyāya or other Indian 
>> >>> schools? The Caitanya-caritāmṛta several times affirms that the Veda is 
>> >>> ’self-evident’, svataḥ pramāṇa, but the term is not used there as a 
>> >>> general or secular epistemic strategy. Is the CC simply repeating a 
>> >>> well-known epistemic principle?
>> >>> 
>> >>> All help will be greatly appreciated.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>> Howard
>> >>> 
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
>> >> 
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
>> > 
>> > 
>> > --
>> > 
>> > Brendan S. Gillon                       email: [email protected] 
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > Department of Linguistics
>> > McGill University                       tel.:  001 514 398 4868
>> > 1085, Avenue Docteur-Penfield
>> > Montreal, Quebec                        fax.:  001 514 398 7088
>> > H3A 1A7  CANADA
>> > 
>> > webpage: http://webpages.mcgill.ca/staff/group3/bgillo/web/
>> > 
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > INDOLOGY mailing list
>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology

Reply via email to