>From: Hudi Darminto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Siti Nurbaya:
> >
> > Why men just could not understand that?
>

Hudi Darminto:
>       The problem is, who made the rumors about it ?.


Noor comment:

I am more than agree with Siti Nurbaya that most Indonesian are quiet and 
still believe that silent is golden, that having opinion,  debating, 
criticizing is considered as emotional, childish, not mature. This 
collective feeling, as far  as I know, rooted in Javenese values, as we can 
see, some non-Javanese Indonesian, are more straightforward and expressive.

That is y, Indonesian's image of a leader is somebody who is untouchable, 
never say or do wrong, or what Javanese said as "sabdo pandhito ratu" which 
means that what have been said by the leader, will be a law, will always 
right. If u learn from the way Soeharto lead Indonesia, none of his 
statements were wrong, since he never say anything. There were his 
employees, the "begundal", who said things which sometimes wrong, but not 
him.

Further, Noor speculate:

Ms next president, is as smart as him (she meant Suharto), or by accident is 
just because dunno anything to say (I'm not sure which one is right) win the 
heart of most Indonesian, just because she said nothing. This sound funny 
for people who used to believe that everything should be brought to the 
surface, to be transparent, to be discussed and solved.

Siti Nurbaya:

My hypotheses:

Mega (female) appreciate Indo culture (as what Noor comment above) better 
than Amin, Yusril do (male).

Evidence:
Mega win the heart of more Indonesian than other candidates-all of them are 
male

Implications:
Male politician in Indo should spend more time with their wife to gain more 
appreciation on our culture. Do not just copy what the US do, for example 
open debate forum.

This is not rumours.

It's just hypotheses that I found interesting in my appreciation on women 
contribution to our reformasi. As hypotheses, it is surely subject to 
"accept/reject" test.

If you think that we should reject it, please argue.

Is it worth arguing? Yes

Practical contribution:
Provide insight into what precise form our current changes with respect to 
women participation.

Theoretical contribution:
Provide insight into what precise form of democracy we are practising at the 
moment.


Siti Nurbaya


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Kirim email ke