> OTOH, it might be OK to modify the behaviour of the 'annotate' command > to mimic the expansion behaviour of the checkout/update command. If > someone were inclined to write such a patch ;=)
That sounds the reasonable path. However, it doesn't explain why the output of the log command is annotated incorrectly, but the code changes are annotated correctly. Sounds like I'm on a losing wicket here - a deprecated keyword substitution combined with a little-used command. I wonder if Subversion works in these circumstances? ;-) Hugh _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
