Ken Murchison wrote: > There might be a little bit of pain involved for large sites to migrate > to IMAP 2.1/SASL 2.x, but there aren't any showstoppers that I'm aware > of. > > If CMU can do it (and yes, they are using Sendmail 8.12.x with SMTP > AUTH), then any site should be able to do it. > Could you tell us a little more about that experience? How is CMU set up? 2 separate SASL libraries (one of each version)? How is sasldb handled between the 2, if at all? What are the main sources of pain likely to be seen in the upgrade, and how can they be mitigated?
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Joe Rhett
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Jeremy Howard
- RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Enric Ramos
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Ken Murchison
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Joe Rhett
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Ken Murchison
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 simon
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Joe Rhett
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Jeremy Howard
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Ken Murchison
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Jeremy Howard
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Ken Murchison
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Joe Rhett
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Eric Estabrooks
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Rob Siemborski
- Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Joe Rhett
- RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Enric Ramos
- RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Ramiro Morales
- RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Enric Ramos