Ken Murchison wrote:
> There might be a little bit of pain involved for large sites to migrate
> to IMAP 2.1/SASL 2.x, but there aren't any showstoppers that I'm aware
> of.
>
> If CMU can do it (and yes, they are using Sendmail 8.12.x with SMTP
> AUTH), then any site should be able to do it.
>
Could you tell us a little more about that experience? How is CMU set up? 2
separate SASL libraries (one of each version)? How is sasldb handled between
the 2, if at all? What are the main sources of pain likely to be seen in the
upgrade, and how can they be mitigated?


Reply via email to