On Friday, 14 Jul 2023 at 01:56, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > I think so, yes. These numbers cannot be interpreted directly as used > memory. It's more like "time spent inside the function, measured > memory-usage wise.
Ah, okay. Total misunderstanding on my part! > Hmm. Ok. We could try with M-x trace-function pp-to-string RET > directly before `gnus-summary-exit'. A popup buffer should appear, and > it would be helpful if you could again post the output (with any private > data obfuscated; we are interested in the argument(s) of the function > call(s)). But before that please M-x untrace-all RET. The trace output is difficult to obfuscate so I won't include it here but what it shows is that the function is passed the full contents of the adaptive scoring file, not the static score file. > Are things significantly faster when setting this to pp-28? Very much so! Group exists almost immediately, back to what I used to see. With pp-28, I'm happy! Problem solved. :-) Thank you, eric -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 30.0.50 2023-07-10) on Debian 12.0
