On Oct 1, 2009, at 18:49, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Maybe other areas like TSV have specific reasons to create a WG like TSVWG which has lots of documents, I don't see the same in Int-Area.
Note that TSV has both a "general transport stuff" WG (TSVWG -- *not* chaired by the ADs) and tends to meet as TSVAREA (open meeting, no deliverables).
I do think the charter proposed would fit an INTWG well. I would hate to lose the open forum style INTAREA, too.
Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
