About the SEAL, we have talked about it in the INT area meetings on three separate occasions since IETF71, and the document has matured significantly since that time. About a date to advance the document, I believe it can be ready to go much earlier than was listed in the draft wg charter; let's say March 2010. About document category, I favor PS but am willing to discuss other categories.
BTW, I am +1 for formation of the wg. Fred [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Margaret Wasserman > Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 7:23 AM > To: Jari Arkko > Cc: Internet Area > Subject: Re: [Int-area] intarea charter > > > On Oct 1, 2009, at 12:59 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > > > In any case, we will make sure that there is an agreement to work on > > every item in the list, either in the form of an earlier informal > > decision (IPID, tunnel, unnumbered) or a new decision (SEAL). Does > > that > > satisfy your concern? > > Yes, definitely. > > I agree that this consensus should be pretty easy to establish in the > case of documents that we've already been successfully developing in > the less formal group. > > Margaret > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
