> On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:27 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Then I think IPmix can be the name or IPf as suggested by stewart.
Yes, those are ok IMO. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10 > From: Joe Touch > To: Khaled Omar > CC: Behcet Sarikaya ,int-area > > > No, IMO. > > It still refers to a codepoint. > > Joe > > On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:23 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can we use IPvTen? >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10 >> From: Behcet Sarikaya >> To: Joe Touch >> CC: Khaled Omar ,int-area >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > On Sep 28, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > I still didn't recognize what is the problem of version number 10 >>> >>> That number is assigned by IANA if - and only when - a protocol proposal >>> qualifies for that assignment. >>> >>> You don’t have that assignment, so you should stop using it even as a name. >>> >> >> You can say version number TBD >> and in IANA Considerations section say IANA to assign a number to TBD and >> say 10 is preferred. >> >> Regards, >> Behcet >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Int-area mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Int-area mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
