Le 28/09/2017 à 19:21, Khaled Omar a écrit :
U mean IPf, sounds good but after it is implemented it will not be future.
I agree with you, but IMHO I am more modest about the future.
"IPf" is a name that was already used in implementations to mean "IP
filters".
I think that "Future IP" could regroup efforts of:
IPv10 (Khaled), IPv9 (China), IPv6 (ETSI "Transition to IPv6"),
IP-ds9 (see Mr. Eastlake's email).
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 7:03 PM
To: Khaled Omar; Alexandre Petrescu
Cc: int-area
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10
How about Future IP.
- Stewart
On 28/09/2017 16:37, Khaled Omar wrote:
Is there any suggestion for the I-D name other than IPv10?
Khaled
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
