I think that’s fine. The current ones will timeout and you can say that these new ones were updates of the current ones when you submit the new ones.
> On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:43 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we make another new I-D with the new name, and keep the recent one as it > is? > > > From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 9:41 PM > To: Khaled Omar > Cc: int-area > Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10 > > IMO remove “10” everywhere, including the document name (I.e., the file name). > > Joe > > On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:38 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry, I forgot to Cc the int-area mailing list, but I forwarded it before > you remind me. > > > From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 9:36 PM > To: Khaled Omar > Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10 > > Please post to the list. I do not want to engage in offline discussions. > > On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:33 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do we need to change the whole I-D to refer to the new name or the contents > remains the same except replacing IPv10 to IPmix or IPf? > > > > From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 9:29 PM > To: Khaled Omar > Cc: int-area > Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10 > > > > On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:27 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Then I think IPmix can be the name or IPf as suggested by stewart. > > Yes, those are ok IMO. > > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10 > From: Joe Touch > To: Khaled Omar > CC: Behcet Sarikaya ,int-area > > > > > No, IMO. > > It still refers to a codepoint. > > Joe > > On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:23 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we use IPvTen? > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10 > From: Behcet Sarikaya > To: Joe Touch > CC: Khaled Omar ,int-area > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sep 28, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > I still didn't recognize what is the problem of version number 10 > > That number is assigned by IANA if - and only when - a protocol proposal > qualifies for that assignment. > > You don’t have that assignment, so you should stop using it even as a name. > > > You can say version number TBD > and in IANA Considerations section say IANA to assign a number to TBD and say > 10 is preferred. > > Regards, > Behcet > Joe > > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
