But, always worth including a "do be deleted" note to the reviewers to
stop then all sending in feedback about the nits failure.
Stewart
On 27/11/2018 20:42, Joe Touch wrote:
FWIW:
On 2018-11-27 12:22, Ron Bonica wrote:
Fred,
If the NFSv2 and iPERF issues are not blocking, I would like to omit
them. The following are rational:
...
- Mechanically, it is difficult to reference an RFC that has been
obsoleted in an internet draft. The NIT checker complains bitterly.
Those complaints are warnings only to help those who cite such
documents inadvertently; you can simply ignore them. (I do all the
time - esp. for historical discussions that cite early versions of
newer RFCs or historical standards).
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
