And yet: https://askubuntu.com/questions/974696/how-can-i-make-the-nfs-server-support-protocol-version-2-in-ubuntu-17-10
I’m not arguing either way, but it’s not the case that old, deprecated protocols aren’t still running. Joe > On Nov 29, 2018, at 8:29 AM, Ron Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks, > > Even if citations weren’t an issue, we are really reaching into the distant > past. > > - NFSv2 was specified by RFC 1094 in 1989. > o I was 31 years old then. > - NFS2 was obsoleted by NFSv4 (RFC 3010) in 2000. > - RFC 3010 was obsoleted by RFC 3530 in 2003 > - RFC 3530 was obsoleted by RFC 7530 in 2015 > - We are citing NFSv2 in a draft that will be published in 2019 > o I will be 61 years old by then. > > > Ron > > > From: Joe Touch <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 9:43 AM > To: Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> > Cc: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>; int-area <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Int-area] draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-03 > > They don’t need to be deleted if you include them deliberately. There is no > prohibition on citing such RFCs for your own documents historical background. > > Joe > > On Nov 29, 2018, at 4:06 AM, Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > But, always worth including a "do be deleted" note to the reviewers to stop > then all sending in feedback about the nits failure. > > Stewart > > > On 27/11/2018 20:42, Joe Touch wrote: > FWIW: > > > > > On 2018-11-27 12:22, Ron Bonica wrote: > > Fred, > > If the NFSv2 and iPERF issues are not blocking, I would like to omit them. > The following are rational: > > ... > - Mechanically, it is difficult to reference an RFC that has been obsoleted > in an internet draft. The NIT checker complains bitterly. > > Those complaints are warnings only to help those who cite such documents > inadvertently; you can simply ignore them. (I do all the time - esp. for > historical discussions that cite early versions of newer RFCs or historical > standards). > > Joe > > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
