They don’t need to be deleted if you include them deliberately. There is no prohibition on citing such RFCs for your own documents historical background.
Joe > On Nov 29, 2018, at 4:06 AM, Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > But, always worth including a "do be deleted" note to the reviewers to stop > then all sending in feedback about the nits failure. > > Stewart > > >> On 27/11/2018 20:42, Joe Touch wrote: >> FWIW: >> >> >> >> >>> On 2018-11-27 12:22, Ron Bonica wrote: >>> >>> Fred, >>> >>> If the NFSv2 and iPERF issues are not blocking, I would like to omit them. >>> The following are rational: >>> >>> ... >>> - Mechanically, it is difficult to reference an RFC that has been obsoleted >>> in an internet draft. The NIT checker complains bitterly. >> >> Those complaints are warnings only to help those who cite such documents >> inadvertently; you can simply ignore them. (I do all the time - esp. for >> historical discussions that cite early versions of newer RFCs or historical >> standards). >> >> Joe >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Int-area mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
