Hi Juan-Carlos,
During the 6man last call for draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection, I made the
following change and submitted -01 of rfc8835bis:
7.5. Changes from draft-int-intarea-rfc8335bis-00
* Changed "For the operations in this memo" to "In the PROBE
application" to better align with draft-ietf-6man-
icmpv6-reflection
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis-00&doc_2=draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis-01
I believe that this minor change does not merit an additional last call in
this group, and in my opinion the document is ready to advance.
Bill
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 2:28 PM Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <juzuniga=
[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear IntArea WG,
>
>
>
> The authors of Draft
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis/ are
> requesting a WGLC. The latest draft was presented at IETF 122 and over time
> we have seen some interest from the WG.
>
>
>
> Hence, we are starting now a 2-week WG Last Call.
>
>
>
> Please express your support/comments by replying to this email. The call will
> end on Friday the 6th of June (AoE).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Juan-Carlos & Wassim
>
> (IntArea WG chairs)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
