I have read this document and I support its publication. One comment is that since clearly there is a connection between the current draft and draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection, I would suggest the following update: OLD: In the PROBE application, the ICMP Extension Structure MUST contain exactly one instance of the Interface Identification Object (Section 2.1), and the ICMP Extension Structure does not cover the rest of the packet; it ends at the end of the single Interface Identification Object, and what follows is simply optional data. The behavior when it contains a different Extension Object is not defined by this memo but may be defined in the future. NEW: In the PROBE application, the ICMP Extension Structure MUST contain exactly one instance of the Interface Identification Object (Section 2.1), and the ICMP Extension Structure does not cover the rest of the packet; it ends at the end of the single Interface Identification Object, and what follows is simply optional data. The behavior when it contains a different Extension Object is not defined by this memo but may be defined in other documents, such as [I-D.ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection].
Cheers, Tal. On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 5:59 PM Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear IntArea WG, > > > > Our AD Éric Vyncke and the rest of the IESG would like to see at least 5 > reviews from the WG before declaring a WGLC draft approved. > > > > Since we don’t have 5 reviews from the last version of this draft, we will > have to declare this WGLC ‘failed due to lack of reviews’ ☹ > > We will re-open another WGLC for two weeks, expecting to get at least 5 > comments. > > > > Best, > > > > JC & W > > > > From: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, September 8, 2025 at 18:46 > To: Bill Fenner <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: [Int-area] Re: WGLC for "PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces" > draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis > > HI Bill, > > > > Thanks a lot for the update. I agree that the change is minor. > > > > We will wait a few days in case anyone in the group has any comment. > Otherwise, we will move ahead with the process. > > > > Best, > > > > Juan-Carlos > > > > > > > > From: Bill Fenner <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, September 8, 2025 at 17:56 > To: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Int-area] WGLC for "PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces" > draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis > > Hi Juan-Carlos, > > > > During the 6man last call for draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection, I made the > following change and submitted -01 of rfc8835bis: > > > > 7.5. Changes from draft-int-intarea-rfc8335bis-00 > > * Changed "For the operations in this memo" to "In the PROBE > application" to better align with draft-ietf-6man- > icmpv6-reflection > > > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis-00&doc_2=draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis-01 > > > > I believe that this minor change does not merit an additional last call in > this group, and in my opinion the document is ready to advance. > > > > Bill > > > > > > On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 2:28 PM Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear IntArea WG, > > > > The authors of Draft > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis/ are > requesting a WGLC. The latest draft was presented at IETF 122 and over time > we have seen some interest from the WG. > > > > Hence, we are starting now a 2-week WG Last Call. > > > > Please express your support/comments by replying to this email. The call will > end on Friday the 6th of June (AoE). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Juan-Carlos & Wassim > > (IntArea WG chairs) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
