I have read this document. Appending the optional data
field at the end of the Request/Response message is useful
and I support its publication.
Regards,
Xiaoming
On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 5:59
PM Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga)
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear IntArea WG,
>
>
>
> Our AD Éric Vyncke and the rest of the IESG would like to see at least 5 reviews from the WG before declaring a WGLC draft approved.
>
>
>
> Since we don’t have 5 reviews from the last version of this draft, we will have to declare this WGLC ‘failed due to lack of reviews’ ☹
>
> We will re-open another WGLC for two weeks, expecting to get at least 5 comments.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> JC & W
>
>
>
> From: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, September 8, 2025 at 18:46
> To: Bill Fenner <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Int-area] Re: WGLC for "PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces" draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis
>
> HI Bill,
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for the update. I agree that the change is minor.
>
>
>
> We will wait a few days in case anyone in the group has any comment. Otherwise, we will move ahead with the process.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Juan-Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Bill Fenner <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, September 8, 2025 at 17:56
> To: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] WGLC for "PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces" draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis
>
> Hi Juan-Carlos,
>
>
>
> During the 6man last call for draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection, I made the following change and submitted -01 of rfc8835bis:
>
>
>
> 7.5. Changes from draft-int-intarea-rfc8335bis-00
>
> * Changed "For the operations in this memo" to "In the PROBE
> application" to better align with draft-ietf-6man-
> icmpv6-reflection
>
>
>
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis-00&doc_2=draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis-01
>
>
>
> I believe that this minor change does not merit an additional last call in this group, and in my opinion the document is ready to advance.
>
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 2:28
PM Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear IntArea WG,
>
>
>
> The authors of Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis/ are requesting a WGLC. The latest draft was presented at IETF 122 and over time we have seen some interest from the WG.
>
>
>
> Hence, we are starting now a 2-week WG Last Call.
>
>
>
> Please express your support/comments by replying to this email. The call will end on Friday the 6th of June (AoE).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Juan-Carlos & Wassim
>
> (IntArea WG chairs)
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]