Dear IntArea WG,

Our AD Éric Vyncke and the rest of the IESG would like to see at least 5 
reviews from the WG before declaring a WGLC draft approved.

Since we don’t have 5 reviews from the last version of this draft, we will have 
to declare this WGLC ‘failed due to lack of reviews’ ☹

We will re-open another WGLC for two weeks, expecting to get at least 5 
comments.

Best,

JC & W

From: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, September 8, 2025 at 18:46
To: Bill Fenner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [Int-area] Re: WGLC for "PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces" 
draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis
HI Bill,

Thanks a lot for the update. I agree that the change is minor.

We will wait a few days in case anyone in the group has any comment. Otherwise, 
we will move ahead with the process.

Best,

Juan-Carlos



From: Bill Fenner <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, September 8, 2025 at 17:56
To: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] WGLC for "PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces" 
draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis
Hi Juan-Carlos,

During the 6man last call for draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection, I made the 
following change and submitted -01 of rfc8835bis:

  7.5.  Changes from draft-int-intarea-rfc8335bis-00

    *  Changed "For the operations in this memo" to "In the PROBE
       application" to better align with draft-ietf-6man-
       icmpv6-reflection

https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis-00&doc_2=draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis-01

I believe that this minor change does not merit an additional last call in this 
group, and in my opinion the document is ready to advance.

  Bill


On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 2:28 PM Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Dear IntArea WG,



The authors of Draft 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis/ are requesting 
a WGLC. The latest draft was presented at IETF 122 and over time we have seen 
some interest from the WG.



Hence, we are starting now a 2-week WG Last Call.



Please express your support/comments by replying to this email. The call will 
end on Friday the 6th of June (AoE).



Thanks,



Juan-Carlos & Wassim

(IntArea WG chairs)


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to