TempTrax Model E - Ethernet Version: I wish I had a spare unit. Maybe we'll order one for a spare, but I don't have one now.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mel Beckman Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:05 PM To: InterMapper Discussion Subject: RE: Nagios false down reads I was suggesting you set this up as a lab test with a spare temp probe. What model device is it? (I think you mentioned the brand in your original message, but that's scrolled out of my inbox). -mel >The probe is 300 miles from the server. I will consider getting a >server in that closet, but the reason that the probe is there, is that >it's a remote, unattended locaiton. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mel Beckman >Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:56 AM >To: InterMapper Discussion >Subject: RE: Nagios false down reads > >Mike, > > At times like these, I like to simplify the problem. Can you >connect a probe directly to an Intermapper server with no intervening >devices or other traffic? Perhaps the problem is with the temperature >probe's SNMP stack? I know some early APC SNMP environmental probes >(the MeasureUPS) would die if pinged or queired too frequently. > > -mel > > >>Yes, I thought just as you did, but increasing the time, seems to >>increase the timeout. Odd. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher L. >>Sweeney >>Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:58 AM >>To: InterMapper Discussion >>Subject: RE: Nagios false down reads >> >>At 9:04 AM -0700 11/5/03, Mike Lieberman wrote: >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:06 AM >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Attn: Down: Cheyenne Temp >>> >>>11/05 10:02:37: IM/NS3 4.1.2b2 >>> >>>Event: Down >>>Name: Cheyenne Temp >>>Document: netwright >>>Address: 216.169.4.18 >>>Probe Type: Nagios Template >>>Condition: Command timed out. >>> >>>Time since last reported down: 1 hour, 53 minutes, 11 seconds >>>Device's up >>>time: N/A >> >>So it _is_ timing out, apparently, which means the command did not >>complete in the alloted time and no response code was received. As you >>know, you can increase the timeout for the probe. I'm seem to recall >>you saying that it didn't help when you tried it before, though? >> >>-- Christopher >>-- >>================================================ >>Christopher L. Sweeney >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://www.dartware.com/ >> >>____________________________________________________________________ > >List archives: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > >To unsubscribe: send email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >____________________________________________________________________ >>List archives: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ >>To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >____________________________________________________________________ >List archives: >http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ >To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >____________________________________________________________________ >List archives: >http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ >To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
